In billboard advertisement, a number of digital billboards are owned by an influence provider, and several commercial houses (which we call advertisers) approach the influence provider for a specific number of views of their advertisement content on a payment basis. Though the billboard slot allocation problem has been studied in the literature, this problem still needs to be addressed from a fairness point of view. In this paper, we introduce the Fair Billboard Slot Allocation Problem, where the objective is to allocate a given set of billboard slots among a group of advertisers based on their demands fairly and efficiently. As fairness criteria, we consider the maximin fair share, which ensures that each advertiser will receive a subset of slots that maximizes the minimum share for all the advertisers. We have proposed a solution approach that generates an allocation and provides an approximate maximum fair share. The proposed methodology has been analyzed to understand its time and space requirements and a performance guarantee. It has been implemented with real-world trajectory and billboard datasets, and the results have been reported. The results show that the proposed approach leads to a balanced allocation by satisfying the maximin fairness criteria.

In a typical billboard advertisement technique, a number of digital billboards are owned by an influence provider, and many advertisers approach the influence provider for a specific number of views of their advertisement content on a payment basis. If the influence provider provides the demanded or more influence, then he will receive the full payment or else a partial payment. In the context of an influence provider, if he provides more or less than an advertiser's demanded influence, it is a loss for him. This is formalized as 'Regret', and naturally, in the context of the influence provider, the goal will be to allocate the billboard slots among the advertisers such that the total regret is minimized. In this paper, we study this problem as a discrete optimization problem and propose four solution approaches. The first one selects the billboard slots from the available ones in an incremental greedy manner, and we call this method the Budget Effective Greedy approach. In the second one, we introduce randomness with the first one, where we perform the marginal gain computation for a sample of randomly chosen billboard slots. The remaining two approaches are further improvements over the second one. We analyze all the algorithms to understand their time and space complexity. We implement them with real-life trajectory and billboard datasets and conduct a number of experiments. It has been observed that the randomized budget effective greedy approach takes reasonable computational time while minimizing the regret.

Creating and maximizing influence among the customers is one of the central goals of an advertiser, and hence, remains an active area of research in recent times. In this advertisement technique, the advertisers approach an influence provider for a specific number of views of their content on a payment basis. Now, if the influence provider can provide the required number of views or more, he will receive the full, else a partial payment. In the context of an influence provider, it is a loss for him if he offers more or less views. This is formalized as 'Regret', and naturally, in the context of the influence provider, the goal will be to minimize this quantity. In this paper, we solve this problem in the context of billboard advertisement and pose it as a discrete optimization problem. We propose four efficient solution approaches for this problem and analyze them to understand their time and space complexity. We implement all the solution methodologies with real-life datasets and compare the obtained results with the existing solution approaches from the literature. We observe that the proposed solutions lead to less regret while taking less computational time.